Important update 9/1/21: The government is lying to you about FDA approval of the Pfizer vaccine.
- The FDA has only approved Pfizer’s “Comirnaty” vaccine, not Pfizer’s BioNTech vaccine that is being distributed in America. Comirnaty is going to be produced in a French production facility that hasn’t even been constructed yet. Comirnaty is not available anywhere.
- The BioNTech vaccine is still licensed under the Emergency Use Authorization Act that grants total immunity to vaccine producers. Also, it is illegal for any company to force employees to take an experimental vaccine according to the EUA itself. If your company is forcing you to take a vaccine, contact attorney Robert Barnes to file a lawsuit against them.
- UK data shows vaxed dying at higher rate than unvaxed.
- Swedish data shows no excess deaths, mirroring this censored Hopkins study.
- (9/1) New study indicates just one part of the spike protein can cause cytokine storms in animal studies.
- (9/1) Those who are vaccinated have higher all cause morbidity and mortality than the unvaccinated according to clinical trial data.
In this article, I’m going to explain in fairly simple terms what mRNA is, how the new COVID vaccines utilize it and why those vaccines are needlessly killing thousands of people. I’m making frequent updates to this article as new information arises.
So What Exactly Is mRNA?
Messenger RNA (mRNA) is tool that your cells use to make working copies of genes from your DNA. Think of mRNA as being like a Xerox copy of just a small part of your entire genome’s DNA. Your cells use the mRNA copies to do the actual assembling of proteins in your body. If you take a strand of mRNA and insert it into the body of a cell, the cell will try and build whatever protein is encoded on that strand of mRNA.
The SARS-CoV-2 virus (which causes COVID-19) has a distinct spike protein that it uses to latch onto cells in order to infect them (1). This spike protein shares many similarities with the spike protein found in HIV viruses. In fact, certain genetic fragments are so similar between HIV and SARS-CoV-2 that some HIV tests will show a false positive result if a patient has COVID (2).
How Do The Vaccines Work?
The mRNA vaccines work by taking the gene sequence of that spike protein found in the SARS-CoV-2 virus and encoding it onto a strand of mRNA. In the Pfizer vaccines at least, that mRNA strand is then placed in a micro sized bubble of fat, which is then coated with an experimental formulation of polyethylene glycol (PEG) and highly toxic graphene oxide in order to make it resistant to your immune system (3)(22)(8). The Moderna vaccine is similar to the Pfizer vaccine, but the J&J one utilizes a slightly different method of delivering the mRNA to your cells.
These special toxic fat capsules allow the mRNA in the vaccines to pass through the cell walls in your body, which then causes your body’s cells to “express” or build copies of the spike protein on their own. Currently all vaccines in the United States for COVID-19 cause the body to express the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. In other words, the vaccines highjack your cells and turn them into spike protein manufacturing facilities.
Your body’s immune system will recognize these spike proteins as being foreign and toxic, which results in your body constructing antibodies to clear them from your system. The hope is that when your body encounters these spike proteins from a wild virus it will already know how to deal with them.
Are The Vaccines Effective?
So far, the vaccines have been a mixed bag. First, let’s go over the positive results we’ve seen from these vaccines and then we will discuss the dangers. According to physicians I personally know, the vast majority of patients they are now seeing in their emergency rooms for COVID are unvaccinated people. This has been echoed by reports from the press claiming 99% of new COVID patients are unvaccinated people (4). These claims need to be put in perspective.
The total number of COVID patients are far below where they were at the peak of the pandemic according to the CDC’s own data (5). So while the vast majority of new patients may be unvaccinated (in the US at least), the actual amount of real harm being done by the virus is much less than it was previously. The death rate has dropped to practically zero, with the 7 day average dipping below 1 per 100,000 in the general population. For comparison, flu and pneumonia can kill upwards of 177,000 people a year, which works out to roughly the same daily average COVID is at now (44). We can thank better treatment methods, along with the unvaccinated population being generally younger and healthier, for this dramatic decline in death rates.
Currently there are many reports of vaccinated individuals coming down with COVID. A recent outbreak in Cape Cod showed 346 cases of vaccinated individuals coming down with COVID along with 80% of those cases being symptomatic (23). Most of the new cases of COVID in Australia and Israel are in vaccinated individuals. Back in July, Israel reported 7,700+ new cases since May, with ~3,000 of those occurring in vaccinated individuals. Only 72 out of those 7,700+ cases were in people who had a previous COVID infection (45). Natural immunity appears to be far more robust than vaccine based immunity.
Based on this data, even though it is now clear that the vaccines do not prevent infections from occurring, it seems that the vaccines are, at present, capable of reducing the harm at-risk populations face from COVID, but that does not mean the vaccines themselves are harmless, nor does it mean things are going to stay this way in the future.
This study provides a detailed breakdown of the relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction of contracting COVID for several of the currently authorized vaccines. Most vaccines only reduce your absolute risk of contracting COVID by less than 1.5%.
Are The Vaccines Safe?
It turns out the spike proteins that are utilized by the vaccines to help prime your immune system from the virus are harmful all on their own. Several studies have shown that these spike proteins alone (without the rest of the viral components) are capable of damaging the lining of your blood vessels, particularly the kind of blood vessels found in the lungs (6)(7). There have been many reports of people developing myocarditis and pericarditis (inflammation of the heart) immediately following vaccination (34). While vaccine induced myocarditis seems to resolve itself with treatment, it still highlights a dangerous inflammatory effect of these vaccines.
It’s now well known that these vaccines can induce blood clotting disorders in some people. A recent study uncovered the exact mechanism of this disorder (29). The study found that in some people, the antibodies they create against the vaccine can actually bind with their blood platelets, which then leads to the platelets becoming active and forming clots. This risk is greatest in the J & J vaccine because it uses a deactivated adenovirus to deliver the mMRA into your cells, which itself has been linked to clotting in previous studies (33).
In this study that looked at the safety of giving pregnant women vaccines, they found an enormously high rate of spontaneous abortions in women who took the vaccine prior to the third trimester (30). I feel the study tried to cover this fact up with deceptive data manipulation. The authors never mention this fact directly in the study, and go on to conclude that vaccines for pregnant women in the third trimester are safe.
Out of 827 total pregnant women the study observed, 700 of them received their first dose in the third trimester, leaving a total of 127 women who got their first dose before the third trimester. Out of a total of 104 spontaneous abortions that occurred for the entire group, 96 of them occurred before 13 weeks of gestation. So that means 96 out of 127 pregnant women who took the vaccine before the third trimester experienced a spontaneous abortion – call me crazy, but I would consider that statistic to be highly alarming. The authors never bother to mention it.
It’s also worth noting that the experimental nanoparticles that encapsulate the mRNA end up aggregating heavily in ovaries, as well as in the spleen, liver and adrenal glands (8). These coated particles are carrying graphene oxide directly to those tissues. We do not know what the long term consequences of this may be, because again, these vaccines all skipped the long term trials that would normally uncover these things. Also consider that these particles may aggregate over time, so the more boosters you get, the more toxins may build up in those tissues. Perhaps two doses doesn’t cause any noticeable damage, but maybe three or four will. We can’t say for sure. No long term reproductive studies have been done on these vaccines.
As for the PEG the nanoparticles are made out of, in large doses, PEG seems to be safe, but when given in the very small doses found in vaccines, it can cause a cascade of reactions that result in anaphylaxis or cardiac arrest (31). So far there have been over a thousand reports of cardiac arrest immediately following vaccination. Many people attribute this to clots caused by vaccines, but this could also be caused by an allergic chain reaction. In a study done on pigs, this reaction didn’t manifest itself until the second time they were injected with PEG (32).
One other potential issue of grave concern is the development of a syndrome called Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) in vaccinated individuals. ADE occurs when the antibodies in your immune system not only fail to stop a virus, but enhance it’s infectivity through various pathways, resulting in a more severe illness (21). ADE can occur either from vaccines or from a natural infection of differing strains of a virus. Some doctors are saying that, because we are now seeing vaccinated individuals becoming infected at increasing rates, the vaccines must be producing ADE. While this is possible, typically ADE presents as a very acute illness. We would expect vaccinated people to be turning up in hospitals with super-COVID if ADE was actually occurring. We would be seeing increasing death rates, not lower death rates.
That said, we do have some unconfirmed reports of vaccinated individuals showing greater viral loads than non-vaccinated individuals (20). If these reports do turn out to be true and widespread, this would indeed be an indication that ADE could be occurring. Pray to God this isn’t happening, because if it does, it would make the Spanish Flu look like a Sunday picnic. Also, just because we are not seeing it now doesn’t mean it could not occur in the future. The risk of this happening may be extremely low, but it is not zero.
The CDC maintains several applications that are used to track adverse events that occur coincidentally with the administration of a vaccine, one of which is called the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS data is publicly searchable online, so we can see vaccine injury reports in real time (9). While there is no way to prove that a death or injury reported to VAERS is directly linked to the administration of a vaccine, it still provides us with a useful metric because we can compare various vaccines to each other and see how they stack up.
For example, if we run a search for all adverse events reported for every single flu vaccine ever made for the entire history of the VAERS database going back decades, we get 190,383 adverse reactions reported, with 1,225 of those being deaths. Historically, about 150 million doses of flu vaccine have been administered in the US per year for the past decade, as compared to 165 million doses of COVID vaccines administered so far (11).
When I run a query for all COVID vaccines for all locations as of 8/2/21, I get a total of 518,770 adverse events reported, with 6,317 of those being deaths (6,674 as of 8/19/2021). These adverse events are just what is reported. Typically minor adverse reactions are greatly under-reported while serious reactions are more likely to be under-reported by a smaller margin (10). It is illegal to submit a false report to the VAERS system.
Do I have your attention now? It should be obvious that the COVID vaccines are vastly more dangerous than your average vaccine just based on the VAERS data. Keep in mind that several States halted the distribution of swine flu vaccines after a mere three deaths were reported (12). What we are seeing in the VAERS data for COVID vaccines is a holocaust by comparison.
Here’s a small sample of the more serious adverse events, excluding deaths, that have been reported for the COVID vaccines in VAERS as of 8/2/21:
There are more issues to consider that we have no data on at all. For example, the mRNA strands that encode the spike protein in the vaccines are not all perfect and intact, some are fragmented and broken during the manufacturing process. What are the long term effects of these mRNA fragments being encoded into broken proteins? – No one knows. What are the long term effects of these vaccines in immunocompromised individuals? – No one knows. It appears the vaccines reprogram some innate immune responses (46); no one knows what the long term consequences of this will be. The point being, no long term trials were done before this was rammed into half the world’s collective arms. This is an experiment that is still ongoing.
And finally, should you be seriously impacted by an adverse event, there are virtually no legal remedies available to you. Many people don’t know that vaccine makers and distributers are completely immune from lawsuits claiming damages from COVID vaccines. These experimental vaccines are not even given token coverage by the US “vaccine court.” The “vaccine court” (which has no judge or jury, and is funded by the sale of vaccines themselves) only applies to a select set of vaccines, and the COVID vaccines aren’t not on that list.
So Now What?
You’re probably wondering, “So how does the math work out? If the vaccine could potentially kill me and COVID could potentially kill me, do I get the vaccine or do I take my chances with COVID?”
Well, the good news is you don’t have to do either of those things if you don’t want to. The NIH, FDA and CDC, in collusion with Big Pharma, have worked furiously over the past year to crush any potential pre-existing treatments for COVID. They had to do this, otherwise there is no way the vaccines could have been granted emergency approval by the FDA. A legal prerequisite for emergency use authorization is that no pre-existing repurposed drug treatment with a proven safety record exists. In fact, this is an ongoing requirement. If an effective repurposed drug treatment is found, the emergency use authorization must be suspended according to law. It turns out that several such drugs have been identified as effective treatments for COVID, particularly Ivermectin (13)(14)(15)(16).
Of the literature I’ve looked at, hydroxychloroquine has not, when used completely on its own, been shown to be an effective treatment for COVID. That’s not to say it doesn’t work, it’s just that I haven’t seen good data on it. However, hydroxychloroquine might be effective if combined with a TMPRSS2 inhibitor, such as Camostat (13)(15). I have also seen studies that show increased survival rates when HCQ is combined with zinc (26). On the other hand, Ivermectin does appear to have a very impressive track record all on its own, as well as being extremely safe. (14)(24).
One study of healthcare workers showed that taking 12 mg of Ivermectin once weekly for up to 10 weeks resulted in none of the 788 workers taking it contracting COVID, while 58% of the 407 people in the control group who did not take it ended up contracting COVID during the same timeframe (14). Literature reviews of Ivermectin show it to be as effective as vaccines at preventing COVID. Not only does Ivermectin prevent COVID, it is a highly effective treatment for COVID if you’ve already contracted it. A study of 1408 patients in Brazil found that a single dose of .15mg/Kg of Ivermectin reduced mortality by over 600%, with only 1.4% of hospitalized patients dying versus 8.5% of those who did not receive it (14).
There is also natural immunity to consider. You could have already had COVID and not even been aware of it. I came down with severe COVID symptoms in August of 2019, well before this disease ever appeared in the media. New information indicates this disease was in circulation long before it ever became publicly known (37). In one study, researchers found that 12% of blood samples from a lung cancer research trial taken in September of 2019 had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (38). It takes weeks for antibodies to develop and they can persist at detectable levels for over a year in some people (39).
If you think you’ve already had COVID but your antibody test comes back negative, chances are still very high that you actually had COVID. Up to one third of antibody tests report false negatives (40)(41). Once antibodies fade below detectable levels, you still retain a strong level of natural immunity due to immune system memory (42). There is no point in taking a vaccine for something you’ve already recovered from. Studies that claim to show people who already have natural immunity can benefit from vaccination are fundamentally flawed (43).
Prevention And Treatment Protocols For COVID Patients
The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) is an international consortium of ER doctors who are collaborating to develop effective COVID treatment protocols for sick and hospitalized patients. They have published the I-MASK+ protocol for prophylactic and early treatment, along with the MATH+ protocol for the treatment of hospitalized COVID patients. This protocol dramatically reduces the risk of ICU admission and death from COVID. The protocol relies heavily on Ivermectin and Fluvoximine to halt viral replication and reduce inflammation.
In this August 12th FLCCC weekly update, Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Paul Marik discuss the rise of the Delta variant, updates to the MATH+ protocol to address the challenges presented by the variant and the totality of evidence for ivermectin. This update also covers a lot of questions you might have about the use of Ivermectin.
If taking Ivermectin is something that interests you, you might consider sending your doctor an email like this:
Hi Dr. X,
I’d like to get a prescription for Ivermectin as a prophylaxis for COVID as I’m not planning on getting a vaccine until long term clinical trials are completed and their safety is proven. There are currently over 500,000 adverse events and 6,700 deaths reported for these vaccines in the public Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, which is more deaths than all other flu vaccines ever administered combined.
A current listing of all Ivermectin meta-analysis, observational studies and randomized control trials can be found at https://ivmmeta.com. Current peer reviewed studies on Ivermectin include a total of 16,455 patients with 436 authors. Randomized control trails on Ivermectin include a total of 6,561 patients with 359 authors. Overall studies indicate 72% RR 0.28 [0.18-0.45] improvement in early treatment, with 86% RR 0.14 [0.08-0.25] efficacy in prophylaxis.
Here are two of the most comprehensive meta-analysis for the efficacy of Ivermectin prophylaxis:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248252/ For further information on effective COVID protocols, see the FLCCC’s website at:
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ Thanks,
Smartest Patient In World History
I just had a conversation with my primary care doctor who works for Kaiser Permanente, which is the largest managed care provider in the nation, about obtaining prophylactic Ivermectin. He told me he was forbidden from prescribing it. I asked him if there were any other FDA approved drugs that are in common use that he was expressly forbidden from prescribing. The only other drug he could think of was Hydroxychloroquine – LOL! When I asked what would happen if he prescribed it anyways, he refused to give me a straight answer. When I asked how he felt about hospital administration inserting itself into the doctor-patient relationship, he acted as if he hadn’t even considered this to be an issue. Great job Kaiser.
If your primary care doctor refuses to prescribe Ivermectin because he’s chosen to attach his income to a medical consortium that censors and prohibits doctors from effectively treating patients, you can find a list of providers on the FLCCC website who are ready and willing to help treat you and your family. The FLCCC is also working to provide a list of pharmacies who are willing to issue medications based on a doctor’s prescription. Ivermectin can be a bit pricy in America, but I’ve seen it advertised in online Indian pharmacies (which do not require a prescription) for as low as 80 dollars for a hundred 12 mg tablets. I recommend using DuckDuckGo as your search engine to avoid Google censorship.
Another cheap and potentially beneficial way to protect yourself from COVID is a dietary supplement called N-Acetylcysteine, commonly known as NAC (17). You can find NAC available online. It is potentially effective at preventing COVID when taken at the standard daily 600 mg dose most supplements provide. Evidence indicates it can help treat existing COVID when taken daily at 1200 mg doses. Reports show NAC to be effective at preventing influenza, reducing septic shock from influenza as well as treating influenza induced pneumonia. NAC is a powerful anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant. There are several ongoing trials looking into its effectiveness as a treatment for COVID. It’s safe, so there’s very little harm in taking it and the potential upsides are huge. Amazon removed it from their site after it was found to be potentially effective at preventing and treating COVID (18), so make sure you are getting NAC and not Acetyl L-Carnitine, they are not the same thing.
I also advise taking a multi-vitamin containing vitamins B, D, C and zinc, especially if you live in higher latitudes during winter months. As one study notes, “There are a growing number of data connecting COVID-19 infectivity and severity with vitamin D status, suggesting a potential benefit of vitamin D supplementation for primary prevention or as an adjunctive treatment of COVID-19.” (25)(27)(28)
As for wearing masks as a preventative measure, the data indicates they are not effective (37)(38). One randomized control trial actually found cloth masks increased your risk of infection (36). Further, there is no evidence that the virus spreads asymptomatically (35). Asymptomatic spread is the only basis on which mask mandates are being issued, with the assumption being that all people must be forced to wear masks so they don’t inadvertently spread the disease to others because they don’t realize they are sick. To quote one recent study in the journal Nature:
The citywide nucleic acid screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Wuhan recruited nearly 10 million people, and found no newly confirmed cases with COVID-19. The detection rate of asymptomatic positive cases was very low, and there was no evidence of transmission from asymptomatic positive persons to traced close contacts. There were no asymptomatic positive cases in 96.4% of the residential communities.
If they didn’t find a single case of asymptomatic spread in that study, I have to question any study that claims to say otherwise. Masks do not keep you safe, they are simply a control mechanism to keep you in fear.
One final note: this is an engineered virus (19). It is important to remember that the people who engineered this virus are the same ones who are now trying to sell you a vaccine to counter it.
And now you know. Go forth and bash the vaccine fascists with your enlightened understanding of COVID vaccines. I look forward to seeing you all on the digital information battlefield wielding the cudgels of truth I have just endowed you with.
